Another NYC Quant Battle to a 690 GMAT Score! But is it good enough?
A 640, a dubious quant score, a 690 on the horizon
Lara sent over a sweet, detailed email looking to schedule a consultation. I always appreciate prospective students taking the time to relate their GMAT war stories. This info really helps get the ball rolling. Lara had under-performed on her first GMAT (640). I know, not terrible, but the score was absurdly verbal heavy/quant light to the point of being an issue for admissions. In the end we achieved a 690 GMAT score. Was it enough for the gatekeepers at Columbia? Read on to see what went wrong with her initial GMAT quant preparation and how we got her GMAT score moving in the right direction!
A Positive Consultation
Although she’d hit a dead end with her previous GMAT studying, Lara still seemed highly motivated. I have a lot of respect for a positive attitude (especially when it is coupled with a great work ethic!). We decided on 7 weeks of quant only preparation. Somewhat zippy, but for people who have already been studying for months short but sweet works best.
GMAT quant questions are based on very basic math (mixed with a healthy dose of critical thinking). Many people underperforming on the quant section aren’t as comfortable as they should be with this basic underlying math and because of the “math stress” that this causes are severely under-utilizing their critical thinking skills. Lara fell into this category as do many of my NYC tutoring students. She had taken a certain big box GMAT class which emphasized very tough Quant. I find this “shock and awe” quant approach counter-productive - it dings your confidence and saddles you with techniques specific to these ultra-tough-not-GMAT questions. It took a moment for Lara to buy-in to the idea that the “math” part of the GMAT quant isn’t all that tough and that the tough part is actually the critical thinking. After she got over her Quant fear, Lara was surprised at the simplicity of many GMAT questions. There was a lot of “that’s all that is?” Yep!. Her practice test scores rose to the low 700s with the quant surging. The verbal lagged a bit.
GMAT Day: 630
Oh crap... Her score had gone down! The quant had improved nicely from a 35 to a 39 but surprisingly the verbal score had shrunken to a 35. More tutoring? She didn't need it. The fundamentals were in place. Sometimes it just takes a second for the scores to catch up. I offered another GMAT study schedule to organize her preparation for the second exam. She stayed on point. The quant looked great - the verbal still sluggish.
GMAT Day: 640
Flat... but still we were hopeful. The quant was a whopping 45, a full ten points from the 35 she had started from and in the 60th+ percentile range that seems to be the sensitive zone for admission to the best MBA programs. Woohoo. The verbal score was decent but a far cry from the 42 she’d started with. We traded emails and felt that it was worthwhile to take on more GMAT. She still felt motivated and we were both confident that she could add some meaningful points to her GMAT score.
GMAT Day: 690
Oh so close!!!!! She’d almost sealed the deal but still hadn’t quite managed to crush the verbal. Why? A mystery. My guess: she needed a more structured technique for sentence correction. She was good at SC but relied a bit too much on her ear. This approach can be time consuming and can fail you in the stress of test day. Even for natural verbal masters it is super helpful to have some structure to rely on. After the GMAT trilogy we decided to move forward with the 690 GMAT. Did she get in to Columbia? Affirmative!